Cases 61 - 70 of 85
DAVIS v. EASTERN REFRACTORIES CO., INC et al
as 2:2007cv63889
Plaintiff:
DOREEN DAVIS
Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES CO., INC, ECKEL INDUSTRIES INC, FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BUCHANAN et al v. A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2007cv63975
Plaintiff:
DENNIS W. BUCHANAN and KATHRYN BUCHANAN
Defendant:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, HARBISON-WALKER REFRACTORIES, A W CHESTERTON CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
O'BRIEN v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63962
Plaintiff:
PAULINE O'BRIEN
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING C, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, GENUINE AUTO PARTS COMPANY INC, GENUINE AUTO PARTS COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KIERSTEAD et al v. EASTERN REFRACTORIES et al
as 2:2007cv63972
Plaintiff:
JAMES KIERSTEAD and LENORA KIERSTEAD
Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, ECKEL INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, GAF CORP, GAF CORP and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KALER et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63948
Plaintiff:
JAMES KALER and JOAN KALER
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, GARLOCK INC and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC, FLEXITALLIC INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DUBAY v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63947
Plaintiff:
DIANA M DUBAY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS COMPENSATION FUND and AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WINTERS et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO. et al
as 2:2007cv63856
Plaintiff:
CLEOLA WINTERS and AVIS H. CANTY
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO., AC&S, INC., FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
GARLOCK, INC., AC&S, INC. and RILEY STOKER CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, EASTERN REFRACTORIES and MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FULLAM et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63899
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE T. FULLAM and CONNIE T. FULLAM
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., Flintkote Co, PITTSBURGH CORNING C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63970
Plaintiff:
MARTHA G JOHNSON
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING C, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, GAF CORP and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CONSTANCE v. AW CHESTERTON CO et al
as 2:2007cv63890
Plaintiff:
CHARLES G CONSTANCE
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON CO, AW CHESTERTON CO, AW CHESTERTON CO and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND INC, ANCHEM PRODUCTS INC and TURNER & NEWALL PLC
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
