Cases 61 - 70 of 3,247
GUIN, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86570
Plaintiff:
DENNIS STEPHEN GUIN
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HINES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86318
Defendant:
VIACOM, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
E.C. HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BABB, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86528
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS BABB
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86520
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND WILSON
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURTON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86289
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE EARL BURTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86352
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, 3M, D.B. RILEY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALLEY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86373
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., VIACOM, INC., D.B. RILEY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCY L. TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VISSER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86518
Plaintiff:
JOHAN VISSER
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DRUM, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86558
Plaintiff:
GLEN EARL DRUM
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FRANKS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86564
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE FRANKS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
