Cases 71 - 80 of 136
FINNIMORE et al v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2013cv07169
Plaintiff:
THERESA FINNIMORE and ROBERT FINNIMORE
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GODFRY v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07172
Plaintiff:
CHERYL GODFRY
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and SOFRADIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INGLAND v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as 2:2013cv07116
Plaintiff:
DONNA INGLAND
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07126
Plaintiff:
VALERIE VINSON MILLARD HILL and JOSEPH R. HILL, JR.
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. , TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED, ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS et al v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2013cv07070
Plaintiff:
KAY MORRIS and WAYNE MORRIS
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRENNAN v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07059
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH BRENNAN
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. , TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED, ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAUENSTEIN et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as 2:2013cv07057
Plaintiff:
BARBARA HAUENSTEIN and DAVID HAUENSTEIN
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BEER v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2013cv06516
Plaintiff:
REBECCA BEER
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHAPPELL et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06324
Plaintiff:
JUDY CHAPPELL and MARCUS CHAPPELL
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PAXTON-COLLIS et al v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2013cv06165
Plaintiff:
JOY ANNE PAXTON-COLLIS and EUGENE F. COLLIS
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
