Cases 71 - 80 of 3,136
LOTOSKI v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86065
Plaintiff:
DONNA J. LOTOSKI
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WINTER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86083
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WINTER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCKINNON v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86128
Plaintiff:
MARIE MCKINNON
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GUIN, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86570
Plaintiff:
DENNIS STEPHEN GUIN
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
VANEPEREN v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86116
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY VANEPEREN
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BABB, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86528
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS BABB
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LICHTENSTEIN v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86125
Plaintiff:
ROSALIE LICHTENSTEIN
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DRUM, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86558
Plaintiff:
GLEN EARL DRUM
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FRANKS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86564
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE FRANKS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
THOMAS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86108
Plaintiff:
CLYDE THOMAS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
