Cases 71 - 80 of 196
6115187 Canada, Inc. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01631
Plaintiff:
6115187 Canada, Inc.
Defendant:
LG Electronics, Inc., and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kelly v. The Home Depot et al
as 1:2018cv01548
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and The Home Depot
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In-Depth Test LLC v. NXP U.S.A. Inc.
as 1:2018cv01461
Defendant:
NXP U.S.A. Inc.
Plaintiff:
In-Depth Test LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Balor Audio LLC v. Bandlab U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2018cv01285
Defendant:
Bandlab U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Balor Audio LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Symbology Innovations LLC v. Muji U.S.A Limited
as 1:2018cv01262
Plaintiff:
Symbology Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Muji U.S.A Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sentius International, LLC v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al.,
as 1:2018cv01217
Defendant:
LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sentius International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC v. Thomson Reuters U.S.A. Inc.
as 1:2018cv01106
Plaintiff:
Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Thomson Reuters U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
H. Lundbeck A/S et al v. Apicore US LLC
as 1:2018cv01034
Defendant:
Apicore US LLC
Plaintiff:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, H. Lundbeck A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Celgene Corporation v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited et al
as 1:2018cv01005
Plaintiff:
Celgene Corporation
Defendant:
Aurobindo Pharma U.S.A., Inc. and Aurobindo Pharma Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Teijin Limited et al v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv00987
Plaintiff:
Teijin Pharma Limited, Teijin Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Torrent Pharma Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
