Cases 81 - 90 of 110
HANKS et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61775
Plaintiff:
ALEX HANKS and WANDA M. HANKS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANKS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBREGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62356
Plaintiff:
RENE HANKS, JR and LUCY M HANKS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBREGLAS CORPORATION , ACANDS INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANKE v. ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANY
as 2:2010cv57517
Plaintiff:
GALE A. HANKE
Defendant:
ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BURFIELD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53847
Plaintiff:
HANK E. BURFIELD, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Morgan v. CSA, Ltd. Combat Support Associates et al
as 3:2010cv01999
Plaintiff:
David Morgan
Defendant:
CSA, Ltd. Combat Support Associates, AECOM Government Services, Inc., Research Analysis & Maintenance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANKE v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv42075
Plaintiff:
GALE A HANKE
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HANKE v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv41959
Plaintiff:
GALE A HANKE
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Amesbury et al v. CSA, Ltd. et al
as 3:2010cv01712
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Amesbury and Amy Beth Patton
Defendant:
CSA, Ltd., Combat Support Associates, AECOM Government Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANKS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75027
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. HANKS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURFIELD v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70547
Plaintiff:
HANK E. BURFIELD, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
