Cases 1 - 10 of 4,429
CATALDO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06873
Plaintiff:
JASON CATALDO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NORTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06901
Plaintiff:
DENISE NORTON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHAFFER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06904
Plaintiff:
ROBIN SHAFFER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BAJDA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06868
Plaintiff:
HEATHER A. BAJDA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MENDEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06878
Plaintiff:
IRMA MENDEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CONOVER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06665
Plaintiff:
JAMES CONOVER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WALKER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06717
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HAROLD WALKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SANTOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06638
Plaintiff:
ANNAMARIE SANTOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DAZA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06653
Plaintiff:
FELISITAS DAZA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
HANEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06502
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ROBERT HANEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
