Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CURRAX PHARMACEUTICALS LLC v. AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED et al
as 1:2023cv03937
Plaintiff:
CURRAX PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
Defendant:
AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED and AJANTA PHARMA USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
In re: Mylan Inc. et al
as 1:2022mc00501
Petitioner:
Mylan Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Respondent:
Somaxon Pharmaceuticals Inc., Procom One Inc., Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC and others
In re: Somaxon Pharmaceuticals Inc
as 1:2022mc00275
Respondent:
Somaxon Pharmaceuticals Inc., Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC, Currax Holdings LLC and others
Petitioner:
Mylan Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
MYLAN INC. et al v. SOMAXON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03944
Petitioner:
MYLAN INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
Plaintiff:
SOMAXON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and PROCOM ONE INC.
Respondent:
Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC, Currax Holdings LLC and Currax Holdings USA LLC
Interested Party:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
CURRAX PHARMACEUTICALS LLC v. AUROLIFE PHARMA LLC
as 3:2021cv20765
Plaintiff:
CURRAX PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
Defendant:
AUROLIFE PHARMA LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CURRAX PHARMACEUTICALS LLC v. AUROLIFE PHARMA LLC
as 1:2021cv20765
Plaintiff:
CURRAX PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
Defendant:
AUROLIFE PHARMA LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC v. MSN Laboratories Private Limited et al
as 1:2020cv01064
Defendant:
MSN Laboratories Private Limited and MSN Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Plaintiff:
Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01569
Defendant:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Cadila Healthcare Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
