Cases 1 - 7 of 7
NOTTE v. NEW SUSHI, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv06394
Plaintiff:
FINBARR NOTTE
Defendant:
NEW SUSHI, LLC
Cross Claimant:
THE MURAL & WALL PRINTING COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
PARK et al v. FREEHOLD HEALTHCARE, LLC. et al
as 2:2018cv11306
Plaintiff:
JINBUM KIM and JOONSUNG PARK
Defendant:
JUNGHOON SHIN, ROBERT NOTTE, FREEHOLD HEALTHCARE, LLC. DBA HAPPY HOME ADULT DAY CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
GRIMES et al v. AT&T et al
as 2:2015cv08466
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GRIMES and ESTELLE GRIMES
Defendant:
AT&T, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD and others
Cross_claimant:
FLOWSERVE US INC. , FMC CORPORATION , RARITAN SUPPLY COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant:
ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP., ALLIED GLOVE & SAFETY PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CORP. , ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRANCH et al v. AMEC FOSTER WHEELER PLC et al
as 2:2015cv05952
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BRANCH, JR. and CAROL BRANCH
Defendant:
AMEC FOSTER WHEELER PLC, CLEAVER BROOKS, INC, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMAS v. VINCULUM GROUP LIMITED et al
as 2:2015cv03194
Plaintiff:
SUDHAN THOMAS
Defendant:
VINCULUM GROUP LIMITED and ANNAJEE NOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
VESPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv01322
Plaintiff:
GEORGE VESPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , ALCAREL-LUCENT USA, INC., AMERICAN PREMIER UNDERWRITERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
POGGIOLI et al v. A.J. FRIEDMAN SUPPY CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00504
Plaintiff:
THERESA C. POGGIOLI, MARTHA C. SPALDING and DORIS STALLARD
Defendant:
A.J. FRIEDMAN SUPPY CO., INC., A.J. MCNEIL CO.,INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
