Cases 1 - 10 of 323
MONROE v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv60042
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. MONROE, JR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., AMSTED RAIL COMPANY, INC., OLD ORCHARD INDUSTRIAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MONROE v. AMSTED RAIL COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv60038
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. MONROE, JR.
Defendant:
AMSTED RAIL COMPANY, INC., PULLMAN PASSENGER CAR COMPANY, INC. and RAILROAD FRICTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONROE, JR. v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67782
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. MONROE, JR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., AMSTED RAIL COMPANY, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONROE (PAYNE) v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv67763
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. MONROE, JR.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONROE v. GARLOCK, INC.
as 2:2011cv67341
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. MONROE, JR.
Defendant:
GARLOCK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PACE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66926
Plaintiff:
HENRY JOSEPH PACE and WILLIAM H. MONROE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCMANUS et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66957
Plaintiff:
EARL W. MCMANUS, JR. , VIRGINIA L. MCMANUS and WILLIAM H. MONROE, JR.
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONROE v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67144
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. MONROE
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. , VAPOR , OWENS-CORNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLAUGHTER et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66927
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE L. SLAUGHTER and WILLIAM H. MONROE
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONROE et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66789
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. MONROE, JR. and JAMES M. RUFFIN
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
