Cases 1 - 5 of 5
USA Senior Care Network, Inc v. Natl Assn of Ins Cmsnrs, et al
as 11-50540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
USA SENIOR CARE NETWORK, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY BETH SENKEWICZ and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Louisiana Public Service Cmsn, et al
as 10-31241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ERIC SKRMETTA, In his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES FIELD, In his capacity as Commissioner and others
Siesta Village Mkt, et al v. Perry, et al
as 08-10160
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
SIESTA VILLAGE MARKET LLC, doing business as Siesta Market, KEN TRAVIS, KEN GALLINGER and others
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JOHN T STEEN, JR., Commissioner of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, GAIL MADDEN, Commissioner of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, JOSE CUEVAS, JR., Commissioner of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission and others
Amicus Curiae:
SPECIALTY WINE RETAILERS ASSOCIATION, OHIO, 17 OTHER STATES and others
Siesta Village Mkt, et al v. Perry, et al
as 08-10145
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
SIESTA VILLAGE MARKET LLC, doing business as Siesta Market, KEN TRAVIS, KEN GALLINGER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN T STEEN, JR., Commissioner of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, GAIL MADDEN, Commissioner of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission and JOSE CUEVAS, JR., Commissioner of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
GLAZERS WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY INC and REPUBLIC BEVERAGE CO
Stroman Realty Inc v. Richardson
as 06-20095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STROMAN REALTY INC
Defendant - Appellee:
ELAINE RICHARDSON, Commissioner of the Department of Real Estate for the State of Arizona, 2910 North 44th Street, Suite 100, Phoenix, Arizona 85018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
