Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 22-40526
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of Missouri and State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Elldakli v. Garland
as 22-20344
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fathi Elltaif Saad Elldakli, Naglla Kouni Salem Ghadar, Hadil Fathi El Elldakli and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, Department of Homeland Security, Director Alejandro N. Mayorkas and others
State of Texas v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-40367
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant: United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Arizona, State of Alabama, State of Florida and others
State of LA v. Centers for Disease
as 22-30303
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant / Appellant: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Innovation Law Lab
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 22-40110
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of Missouri and State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
AAA Bonding Agency, Inc, et al v. Department of Homeland Sec, et al
as 18-20357
Plaintiff - Appellant: AAA BONDING AGENCY, INCORPORATED and SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, LORETTA LYNCH and JEH JOHNSON
Jose Velasquez, et al v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-40140
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE LUIS VELASQUEZ and HERLINDA VELASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee: KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, MARIO ORTIZ, District Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Deepak Budhathoki, et al v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, DHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-51449
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEEPAK BUDHATHOKI, on behalf of themselves and all others situated persons, CLESMY E. CANALES GONZALES, on behalf of themselves and all others situated persons and KATHERINE YURLIETH TURCIOS-PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee: JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Director of Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, LEON RODRIGUEZ, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity and MARIO R. ORTIZ, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services District Director for San Antonio, in his official capacity
State of Texas v. USA, et al
as 16-41411
Movant - Appellant: RHONDA ANN FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-40796
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor - Appellant: JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?