Cases 1 - 10 of 17
State of Texas v. DHS
as 24-40160
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Valerie Laveus, Francis Arauz, Paul Zito and others
State of Texas v. DHS
as 23-50869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute and Center for Renewing America, Incorporated
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
Mack v. USA
as 23-60558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joy Mack, Others so Affected
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, HHS Office for Human Research Protections, and OHRP Director Dr. Jerry A. Menikoff and others
Great Lakes Dredge v. Magnus
as 23-20516
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Chris Magnus, Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
American Petroleum Institute and American Clean Power Associates
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
State of Texas v. Biden
as 23-10143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
R J Reynolds Tobacco v. FDA
as 23-40076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R J Reynolds Tobacco Company, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Incorporated, ITG Brands LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Stephen M. Hahn, Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Apter v. Dept of Health & Human Svc
as 22-40802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert L. Apter, Medical Doctor, FACEP, Mary Talley Bowden, Medical Doctor and Paul E. Marik, MBBCh, M.MED, FCCM, FCCP
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Health & Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Food & Drug Administration and others
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 22-40526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Missouri and State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
