Cases 1 - 5 of 5
State of Texas v. DHS
as 24-40160
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Valerie Laveus, Francis Arauz, Paul Zito and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
State of Texas v. USA
as 22-40367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arizona, State of Alabama, State of Florida and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-40796
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-40238
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
