Cases 21 - 30 of 179
Robert McClendon v. USA
as 17-20174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. MCCLENDON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Wiley Kuyrkendall
as 17-60031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILEY R. KUYRKENDALL
USA v. Barbara Holmes, et al
as 16-20790
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BARBARA L. HOLMES, BARBARA L. HOMES AS INDEPEDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SHIRLEY H. BERNHARDT and KEVIN W. HOLMES
USA v. Shawanda Nevers
as 16-30978
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWANDA NEVERS, also known as Shawanda Bryant, also known as Shawanda Hawkins, also known as Shawanda Johnson
USA v. Christopher Ewing
as 15-41490
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER EWING and WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
USA v. David Stewart, et al
as 15-20596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID W. STEWART, TARA F. STEWART, RICHARD K. PLATO and others
Linvel Bingham, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-41176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINVEL M. BINGHAM and VICKI L. BINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
James Rodgers, et al v. USA
as 15-20494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES T. RODGERS, CLAUDETTE M. RODGERS, AVRUM M. STEIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chemtech Royalty Assoc, LP, et al v. USA
as 15-30577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHEMTECH ROYALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P., AS TAX MATTERS PARTNER REAL PARTY IN INTEREST DOW EUROPE, S.A., CHEMTECH ROYALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P., BY DOW EUROPE, S.A. AS TAX MATTERS PARTNER, CHEMTECH II, L.P. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bombardier Aerospace Corp. v. USA
as 15-10468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOMBARDIER AEROSPACE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
