Cases 31 - 40 of 52
USA v. Geary Mill
as 16-40617
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GEARY MOHAMMED MILLS
USA v. Taylor Mill
as 16-40258
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TAYLOR ALAN MILLS
Stacey Freeman, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90093
Plaintiff - Respondent:
STACEY FREEMAN, as legal tutrix on behalf of the minor child M B, PAULA L. WINFORD, as legal tutrix on behalf of the minor children J C and M C, PAULA L. WINFORD, as legal tutrix on behalf of the minor child K C and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Byron Mills, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90096
Plaintiff - Respondent:
BYRON MILLS, on behalf of his minor child, GM, JEREMIAH MILLS, on behalf of his minor child, EM, TERRY L. MORGAN, on behalf of his minor children, CM and VM and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Sharon Welcome, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90060
Plaintiff - Respondent:
SHARON WELCOME, as legal tutrix on behalf of the minor children JA(1) and JA(2), JOYCE FRANCIS, as legal tutrix on behalf of the minor child MA, TONYIA HARRIS, as legal tutrix on behalf of the minor child LAB and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Anand Roy, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90051
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ANAND ROY, on behalf of his minor children RR and PR, JAMES FONTENOT, II, on behalf of his minor child JF, III, STANLEY VINSON, on behalf of his minor children LV and SV and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Joseph Bryant, Sr., et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90048
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BRYANT, SR., PAUL W. CHARLES, RICHARD E. COOLEY and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Saphronia Jones, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90028
Plaintiff - Respondent:
SAPHRONIA JONES, IRMA KATELY, ANDERSON KING, JR. and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
