Cases 71 - 80 of 1,312
Wallace v. Lumpkin
as 21-11050
Petitioner / Appellant:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Silver v. Lumpkin
as 21-50984
Petitioner / Appellant:
Reginald Bernard Silver
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rivers v. Lumpkin
as 21-11031
Petitioner / Appellant:
Danny Richard Rivers
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Boydston v. Lumpkin
as 21-11034
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Darren Boydston
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Webb v. Lumpkin
as 21-40758
Petitioner / Appellant:
Corey Darnell Webb
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bradden v. Lumpkin
as 21-11023
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ricci Chambless Bradden, II
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sanchez v. Lumpkin
as 21-50956
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ricardo Sanchez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Read v. Lumpkin
as 21-40751
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Bruce Read, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Wall v. Lumpkin
as 21-40752
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lewis Michael Wall
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Peters v. TDCJ
as 21-20546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Dinah Huffman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
