Cases 1 - 10 of 44
USA v. Losson
as 23-11010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Tanner Keith Losson
Mills v. LeBlanc
as 21-30589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Logan Mills
Defendant / Appellee:
James LeBlanc, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Corrections, Robert Tanner, Ernestine Smith and others
Dimes v. Tanner
as 21-30524
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rory Dimes
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert C. Tanner, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Jones v. Tanner
as 21-30457
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tyrone B. Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert C. Tanner, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
USA v. King
as 21-50543
Defendant / Appellant:
Tanner Lance King
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Davis v. Dallas Child Support
as 21-10540
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian Burton, Indiidual Official Capacity Attorney/Agent Contractor for Dallas County CSEA, Tanner Joy Feast, Individual Official Capacity Court Reporter Contractor for 254th Title IV-D Court, Dallas County Texas Child Support Enforcement Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mayford Kenneth Davis, Jr.
Davis v. Dallas Cty TX Child Support
as 21-10275
Defendant / Appellee:
Tanner Joy Feast, Individual Official Capacity Court Reporter Contractor for 254th Title IV-D Court, Dallas County Texas Child Support Enforcement Agency, Michael J. Oneill, Individual Official Capacity Judge Contractor for 254th Title IV-D Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mayford Kenneth Davis, Jr.
Colvin v. Bickham
as 21-30115
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert C. Tanner, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center and Edward Bickham, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Petitioner / Appellant:
James L. Colvin
Girod v. Tanner
as 20-30814
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert C. Tanner, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Petitioner / Appellant:
Deneil Girod
Alexander v. Tanner
as 20-30779
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert C. Tanner, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ronald Alexander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
