Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vinales v. AETC II
as 24-50113
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Daniels, Individually and as Next of Friend of X.D. and S.D., Barbara High-Daniels, Individually and as Next of Friend of X.D. and S.D., Shane Vinales, Individually and as Next of Friend of L.V. and S.V. and others
Defendant:
AETC II Privatized Housing, L.L.C., AETC II Property Managers, L.L.C. and Hunt ELP, Limited, doing business as Hunt Military Communities
Audrey Dick v. Colorado Housing Ent, L.L.C., et al
as 18-10900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY DICK
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO HOUSING ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. and COMMUNITY RESOURCES AND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Charles Kent v. Houston Housing Authority
as 17-20480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES A. KENT
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY
Audrey Dick v. Colorado Housing Ent, L.L.C., et al
as 17-10357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY DICK
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO HOUSING ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. and COMMUNITY RESOURCES AND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Rosa Serrano v. Regions Bank, N.A., et al
as 15-50707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSA SERRANO
Defendant - Appellee:
REGIONS BANK, N.A., BROKERS CONDUIT, FIRST PRESTON MANAGEMENT and others
James Zablosky, et al v. Alethes, L.L.C., et al
as 14-50223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. ZABLOSKY and KAREN ZABLOSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, MERSCROP, MIDFIRST BANK and others
James Zablosky, et al v. MidFirst Bank, et al
as 13-50756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. ZABLOSKY and KAREN ZABLOSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDFIRST BANK, MIDLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY and UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Serrano v. Un Planter's Bnk NA
as 07-50606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSA SERRANO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PLANTER'S BANK, NA, BEVERLY MITRISIN, Servicing Agent of Union Planter's Bank, NA, FIRST PRESTONS MORTGAGE CORP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
