Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Tapia v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 23-20139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Javier Tapia, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of A.W.T. and Jennifer Welborn
Defendant / Appellee:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Holcombe v. USA
as 22-50458
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Joe Holcombe, Individually, as Heirs at Law and as Representatives of the Estate of John Bryan Holcombe, Deceased, Dalia Lookingbill, Individually and as Guardian of the Person and Estate of R.T., a minor, and as Representative of the Estate of E.G. deceased minor, Claryce Holcombe, Individually, as Heirs at Law and as Representatives of the Estate of John Bryan Holcombe, Deceased and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America
Robison v. CNA Insurance
as 22-40071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Robison, Individually and on behalf of his son, a MINOR, and all similarly situated persons, Diantoinette Jones, individually and on beahlf of minor child, PP, Schmiker Traylor, individually and on beahlf of minor child, RD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CNA Insurance Company and Continental Casualty Company
Robby Trevino, et al v. City of Fort Worth, et al
as 17-11095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBBY JOE TREVINO, Individually, and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Alisha Trevino, and as next friend of A.N., a minor and LAURIE DALE REED, Individually, and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Alisha Trevino, and as next friend of A.N., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
JACOB S. HINZ, Fort Worth Police Officer, THOMAS HAUCK, Fort Worth Police Officer, MATTHEW MCMEANS, Fort Worth Police Officer and others
Carolyn Barnes v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 16-50142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLYN BARNES, individually and on behalf of her children
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, Texas Attorney General, in his official capacity as the chief law enforcement officer of the State of Texas, KIRK COLE, Interim Commissioner and associate DSHS Commissioner, in his official capacity as the interim commissioner, LINDA ACEVEDO, Chief Disciplinary Counsel for the State Bar of Texas, in her official capacity as SBOT-OCDC and others
Carolyn Barnes v. USA, et al
as 15-50729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLYN BARNES, individually and on behalf of her children
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN GITTEL, in her personal capacity and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joseph Flynn, et al v. Amer Honda Motor Co., Inc., et al
as 15-20220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH B. FLYNN, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jacqueline Renee Flynn, Deceased and MARIE ESTHER FLYNN SOORD, Individually
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, SIEMENS CORPORATION, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE GMBH, formerly known as Siemens VDO Automotive AG and others
William Bartel v. Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc., et al
as 15-30004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM E. BARTEL, as personal representative of the Estate of Silas B. Bishop
Defendant - Appellant:
ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LIMITED, CENTRAL GULF LINES, INCORPORATED and others
William Bartel v. American Export Isbrantsen, et al
as 15-30005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM E. BARTEL, As personal representative on behalf of Estate of Joseph L. Dennis
Defendant - Appellant:
AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANTSEN, FARRELL LINES, INCORPORATED, on its own behald and, formerly known as American South African Lines, Successor-in-Interest American Export Lines, Incorporated formerly known as American Isbrandtsen Lines, Incorporated, incorrectly named American Export Isb, AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INCORPORATED and others
Cynthia Hebert v. Omega Protein, Incorporated, et al
as 14-60696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYNTHIA R. HEBERT, Individually; and as the personal representative and mother of Christopher Allen Hebert, Deceased; and on behalf of his rightful beneficiaries at law
Defendant - Appellee:
OMEGA PROTEIN, INCORPORATED and JOHN AND JANE DOES, A; B; C; D; E; F; and G
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
