Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Rowdy Leal, et al v. Paramount Restaurants Grp, Inc, et al
as 14-10136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROWDY LEAL, et ux, Angela Leal, individuals, and on behalf of other similarly situated, SIGIFREDO CISNEROS, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated, TIMOTHY J. HEIDER, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PARAMOUNT RESTAURANTS GROUP, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation, formerly known as Strickland Restaurants, Incorporated, STRICKLAND RESTAURANTS, INCORPORATED, Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) #002, SCRATCH COOKIN, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation and others
Rowdy Leal v. Paramount Restaurants Grp, Inc
as 14-10136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rowdy Leal, et ux, Angela Leal, individuals, and on behalf of other similarly situated, Sigifredo Cisneros, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Timothy J. Heider, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Paramount Restaurants Group, Incorporated, a Texas Corporation, formerly known as Strickland Restaurants, Incorporated, Strickland Restaurants, Incorporated, Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) #002, Scratch Cookin, Incorporated, a Texas Corporation and others
Selma Roadhouse Companeros, et al v. Rowdy Leal, et al
as 13-50878
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SELMA ROADHOUSE COMPANEROS, LTD. and RESTAURANT LAND INVESTMENT, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
ROWDY LEAL, SIGIFREDO CISNEROS, TIMOTHY J. HEIDER and others
John Akins, et al v. Worley Catastrophe Response, et al
as 13-30282
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN AKINS, Individually and, on behalf of all others similarly situated and identified below, TIM ALLEN, EMORY ARCHER and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SULLIVAN, CHARLES BALDWIN, JOHNNY KNIGHTEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLEY CATASTROPHE RESPONSE, L.L.C., WORLEY CATASTROPHE SERVICES, L.L.C. and MICHAEL WORLEY
Steve Moore, et al v. Citgo Refining & Chemicals Co.
as 12-41292
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUBEN PENA, RUSSELL EDLIN, JERRY DAVILA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITGO REFINING AND CHEMICALS COMPANY, L.P.
Talat Nazir v. Baylor College of Medicine, et al
as 12-20246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TALAT NAZIR
Defendant - Appellee:
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE and JOHN DOES 1-25
Daniel Berthelot v. American Postal Workers Union, et al
as 12-20186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. BERTHELOT
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, Local 185, JOHN E. POTTER, in his official capacity as Postmaster General, United States Postal Service and PATRICK R. DONAHOE
John Clayton v. ConocoPhillips Company, et al
as 12-20102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. CLAYTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JAMES D. MCMORRAN and others
Rita Lemons v. CMS, et al
as 12-20037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RITA LEMONS, doing business as Experts Are Us, Inc., doing business as Experts Are Us Medical Equipment, doing business as Experts Are Us Lovely's Home Care
Defendant - Appellee:
CMS, ADMINISTAR FEDERAL, NATIONAL SUPPLIER CLEARINGHOUSE and others
John Martin, et al v. Spring Break '83 Prodn, L.L.C., et al
as 11-30671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MARTIN, an individual, JOHNATHON R. MARTIN, an individual, BRADLEY D. KEYES, an individual and others
Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
SPRING BREAK '83 PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., a California Limited Liability Company, SPRING BREAK '83 DISTRIBUTION, L.L.C., a California Limited Liability Company, BIG SKY MOTION PICTURES, L.L.C., a California Limited Liability Company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES, Does 1 through 10
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES, Local 478, INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES, Local 798 and INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES, MOVING PICTURE TECHINCIANS, ARTISTS AND ALLIED CRAFTS OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND CANADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
