Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kelley v. Alpine Site Services
as 23-20290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Beau Kelley, Alvin Perez Lopez, Anthony Martin and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alpine Site Services, Incorporated
Natl Federation of Indep Bus, et al v. Thomas Perez, Secretary, et al
as 17-10054
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ANDREW D. AUERBACH and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Natl Federation of Indep Bus, et al v. Thomas Perez, Secretary, LABR, et al
as 16-11315
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR MICHAEL J. HAYES and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Thomas Perez, Secretary v. Herbert Bruister, et al
as 14-60811
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Defendant - Appellant:
HERBERT BRUISTER, AMY SMITH and JONDA HENRY
Gate Guard Services, L.P., et al v. Thomas Perez, Secretary
as 14-40585
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GATE GUARD SERVICES, L.P. and BERT STEINDORF
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Dongsheng Huang v. Administrative Review Board, et al
as 14-20006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONGSHENG HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plstc Source Workers, et al v. Coburn
as 07-50399
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PLASTIC SOURCE WORKERS COMMITTEE, IGNACIO PEREZ, BRENDA ABURTO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID G COBURN, doing business as Plastic Source Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
