Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Natalie Konrick v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-30172
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATALIE KONRICK
Defendant - Appellee: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and CHALMETTE REFINING, L.L.C.
Earl Adams, Jr., et al v. Chevron USA, Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-31091
Plaintiff - Appellee: EARL A. ADAMS, JR., ALFRED ALEXANDER, JENELL ANTOINE and others
Defendant - Appellant: JOSEPH F. GREFER
Defendant - Appellee: CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, BISHOPSGATE INSURANCE LIMITED and others
Earl Adams, Jr., et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Incorporated, et al
as 15-90113
Plaintiff - Respondent: EARL A. ADAMS, JR., ALFRED ALEXANDER, PAUL J. ARMAND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: JOSEPH F. GREFER
Defendant - Respondent: CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, BISHOPSGATE INSURANCE LIMITED and others
Joseph Robertson, et al v. Chevron USA, Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-30920
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOSEPH ROBERTSON, LARRY HANKTON, SHARVONNE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellant: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, MOBIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCING US, INCORPORATED, JOSEPH F. GREFER and others
Defendant - Appellee: CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, individually and as the successor corporation of Gulf Oil Exploration & Production, Company, BP EXPLORATION & OIL, INCORPORATED, and/or BP Products North America, Inc. and/or Amoco Oil Company, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and others
Joseph Robertson, et al v. Chevron USA, Incorporated, et al
as 15-90107
Plaintiff - Respondent: JOSEPH ROBERTSON, LARRY HANKTON, SHARVONNE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Petitioner: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, MOBIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCING US, INCORPORATED, JOSEPH F. GREFER and others
Defendant - Respondent: CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, individually and as the successor corporation of Gulf Oil Exploration & Production, Company, BP EXPLORATION & OIL, INCORPORATED, and/or BP Products North America, Inc. and/or Amoco Oil Company, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and others
Roger LeBlanc, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 15-90015
Plaintiff - Petitioner: ROGER JEAN LEBLANC, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, KAREN M. DAVIS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and ASHLEY GUILLORY, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
Bd Cmsnr SE LA Flood Protc, et al v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., et al
as 15-30162
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAKE BORGNE BASIN LEVEE DISTRICT, ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, EAST JEFFERSON LEVEE DISTRICT and others
Defendant / Appellee: BOPCO, L.P., WILLIAMS EXPLORATION COMPANY, J. M. HUBER CORPORATION and others
Amicus Curiae: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bd Cmsnr SE LA Flood Protc, et al v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-30162
Plaintiff - Appellant: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA FLOOD PROTECTION AUTHORITY - EAST, ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, LAKE BORGNE BASIN LEVEE DISTRICT and others
Defendant - Appellee: TENNEESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C., ALTA MESA SERVICES, L.P., ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE, L.L.C. and others
Warren Lester, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 15-90002
Plaintiff - Petitioner: WARREN LESTER, ALFREDA MARSHALL, DAVID QUINN and others
Defendant - Respondent: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, JOSEPH GREFER and others
Warren Lester, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-31383
Plaintiff - Appellant: WARREN LESTER, ALFREDA MARSHALL, DAVID QUINN and others
Defendant - Appellee: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, JOSEPH GREFER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?