Cases 41 - 50 of 225
Liberato Reyes-Medina v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60741
Petitioner:
Liberato Reyes-Medina
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U. S. Attorney General
Nancy Ponce-Medina v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60544
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
NANCY MARIELA PONCE-MEDINA
Alba Medina-Reyes v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60526
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ALBA LUZ MEDINA-REYES
Gary Bilbo, Sr. v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 20-10556
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN NFN FOLEY, K., LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, NFN LOZIER, Adm. Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY DAN BILBO, SR.
Jhomni Medina-Rodriguez, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60334
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JHOMNI EDEMIR MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ, ROSA ANGELINA ABARCA-DE MEDINA and JHOMNI BELARMINO MEDINA-ABARCA
Rogelio Medina ArceIn re: Rogelio Medina Arce
as 20-50283
Petitioner:
In re: ROGELIO ROY MEDINA ARCE
USA v. Angel Medina
as 20-10134
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL ISIDRO MEDINA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Diego Medellin-Medina
as 19-51054
Defendant / Appellant:
DIEGO LUCIANO MEDELLIN-MEDINA, also known as Diego Medina, also known as Diego Medellin, also known as Diego Medellin-Medina, also known as Diego L. Medellin-Medina
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carlos Raymond v. Bexar County Democratic Party, et al
as 19-50757
Defendant / Appellee:
MANUEL MEDINA, in his Official Capacity as Chairman, OTHER STATE AND COUNTY OFFICIALS, BEXAR COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ANTONIO RAYMOND
USA v. Emilio Medina-Rodriguez
as 19-50779
Defendant / Appellant:
EMILIO MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.