Cases 61 - 70 of 311
USA v. Michael Cox, Jr.
as 19-40857
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL WARREN COX, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Cox, Jr.
as 19-40772
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL WARREN COX, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Center for Inquiry, Inc., et al v. John Warren
as 19-11029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR INQUIRY, INCORPORATED, ERIC MCCUTCHAN and ARTHUR BRATTENG
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN F. WARREN
John Johnson v. Rosenberg Police Department, et al
as 19-20615
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY EDER, CITY OF ROSENBERG, DALLIS WARREN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN JOHNSON
Automation Support, Inc., et al v. Becky Wallace, et al
as 19-10769
Defendant / Appellee:
WARREN DAVID HUMBLE and HUMBLE DESIGN, L.L.C.
Petitioner / Appellant:
TODD PHILLIPPI
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SOYOKAZE, INCORPORATED and AUTOMATION SUPPORT, INCORPORATED, doing business as Technical Support
USA v. Jonathon Warren
as 19-10805
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHON EDWARD WARREN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Todd Tomasella v. Division of Child Support, et al
as 19-10614
Defendant / Appellee:
KAUFMAN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT, 45 C.F.R. 75.2 Contractor, in its Individual and Official Capacity, KAUFMAN COUNTY, TEXAS, 45 C.F.R. 75.2 Contractor, DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT, 42 U.S.C. 654(3), in its Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD MICHAEL TOMASELLA
Warren Flowers v. United States of America
as 19-60236
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF SESSIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN C. FLOWERS
James Loften v. Joe Warren, et al
as 19-40278
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK OLIVER, CITY OF AMES, TEXAS, JAMES LOFTEN, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ERIC LOFTEN
USA v. Warren Brown
as 18-20620
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WARREN D. BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
