Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jeffrey Baron v. Daniel Sherman, et al
as 18-10182
Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Appellee:
DANIEL J. SHERMAN, MUNSCH, HARDT, KOPF & HARR, P.C. and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Jeffrey Baron, et al v. Peter Vogel, et al
as 16-10556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON, QUANTEC, L.L.C. and NOVOPOINT, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER S. VOGEL and GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL, L.L.P.
Netsphere, Inc., et al v. Jeffrey Baron, et al
as 15-10341
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Movant - Appellant:
QUANTEC L.L.C. and NOVO POINT, L.L.C.
Appellee:
PETER S. VOGEL, GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL, L.L.P., DYKEMA GOSSETT, P.L.L.C. and others
Appellant:
RPV, LIMITED, AS TRUSTEE OF THE VILLAGE TRUST
Jeffrey Baron v. Daniel Sherman
as 14-10198
Debtor:
In the Matter of: ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY
Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Appellee:
DANIEL J. SHERMAN
Jeffrey Baron v. Elizabeth Schurig, et al
as 14-10092
Debtor:
In the Matter of: JEFFREY BARON
Appellant:
ELIZABETH SCHURIG, DEAN FERGUSON, MARK TAYLOR and others
Appellee:
JEFFREY BARON
Netsphere, Inc., et al v. Jeffrey Baron
as 13-10696
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Movant - Appellant:
QUANTEC L.L.C. and NOVO POINT, L.L.C.
Appellee:
PETER S. VOGEL
Netsphere, Inc., et al v. Jeffrey Baron
as 13-10119
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Movant - Appellant:
QUANTEC L.L.C. and NOVO POINT, L.L.C.
Appellee:
PETER S. VOGEL
Jeffrey Baron v. Daniel Sherman
as 13-10121
Debtor:
In the Matter of: ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY
Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Appellee:
DANIEL J. SHERMAN
Netsphere, Inc. v. Jeffrey Baron, et al
as 12-11082
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Movant - Appellant:
QUANTEC L.L.C. and NOVO POINT, L.L.C.
Appellee:
PETER S. VOGEL
Netsphere, Inc., et al v. Jeffrey Baron, et al
as 12-10804
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Movant - Appellant:
NOVO POINT, L.L.C. and QUANTEC L.L.C.
Appellee:
PETER S. VOGEL and DANIEL J. SHERMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.