Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mewa Martinez v. Bryson
as 21-10322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ana Cecilia Mewa Martinez
Defendant / Appellee:
Tracy Renaud, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services and Tony Bryson, Dallas District Director, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
Chuttani v. U.S. Citizenship
as 21-10318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aashish Chuttani and Bharat Uppalapati
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services and Tracy Renaud, Director, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, in her official capacity
Michael Gahagan v. US Citizenship & Img Services, et al
as 17-30999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. GAHAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION
Michael Gahagan v. US Citizenship & Img Service
as 17-30898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. GAHAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-20639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-30904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Gahagan v. U.S. Citizenship & Img Svc
as 16-30882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE GAHAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Michael Gahagan v. U.S. Citizenship & Img Svc
as 15-31029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE GAHAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Michael Gahagan v. U.S. Citizenship & Img Svc
as 14-31148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE GAHAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-20569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.