Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. SnoWizard, Inc.
as 2:2010cv04275
Plaintiff:
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Defendant:
SnoWizard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Metal Fusion, Inc. v. Rankam Group Ltd et al
as 2:2010cv04262
Plaintiff:
Metal Fusion, Inc.
Defendant:
Rankam Group Ltd and rankam metal products
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Huntwise, Inc. v. Higdon Motion Decoy Systems, Inc.
as 2:2010cv03281
Plaintiff:
Huntwise, Inc.
Defendant:
Higdon Motion Decoy Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Alford Safety Services, Inc. v. Hot-Hed Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01319
Plaintiff:
Alford Safety Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Hot-Hed Inc, Hot-Hed Sales & Service, Inc. and SafeZone Safety Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Blunt Wrap U.S.A., Inc. v. Treezwrap Marketing and Distribution, L.L.C.
as 2:2010cv01212
Plaintiff:
Blunt Wrap U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Treezwrap Marketing and Distribution, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Woolf v. Elegant Cords, L.L.C.
as 2:2010cv01114
Plaintiff:
Kim Clark Woolf
Defendant:
Elegant Cords, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ray Brothers, Inc. et al v. Innovative Metals Company, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01102
Plaintiff:
Ray Brothers, Inc. and Garland Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Innovative Metals Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Gaudet v. J & M Industries, Inc.
as 2:2009cv07577
Plaintiff:
Gayle Gaudet
Defendant:
J & M Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Natural Leaf Inc. v. High Grade Herbal Inc.
as 2:2009cv07014
Defendant:
High Grade Herbal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Roppolo et al v. Waterboy Sports, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03792
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Roppolo, III, Michael A. Roppolo, III, Sports Innovations, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Waterboy Sports, Inc., Medco Sports Medicine, Cramer Sports, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
