Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Bartram v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05396
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bartram
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc., R.V. Shop, Inc. and Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Namer v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2015cv03130
Plaintiff:
Robert Namer
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Remedies et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02382
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrance Remedies and Shelly Remedies
Defendant:
General Motors LLC , Orr Motors of Shreveport, Inc. and Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Bank of America NA v. Garden District Pet Hospital, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01386
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
Garden District Pet Hospital, Inc., French Quarter Vet, Inc and Scott Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America NA v. Duboue Dental, LLC, et al
as 2:2015cv01368
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
Duboue Dental, LLC and Jaclyn Duboue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2015cv00406
Plaintiff:
Khara Amun Bey
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Elliott v. United Companies Lending Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Moses B. Elliott
Defendant:
United Companies Lending Corporation, Homegold, Inc, Full Spectrum Lending, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2014cv02797
Defendant:
Bank of America, DSM Financial and Jennifer Honeycutt
Plaintiff:
Khara Amun Bey
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Saragusa v Countrywide et al
as 2:2014cv02717
Plaintiff:
Karen Saragusa
Defendant:
Countrywide and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
