Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Duhe v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv01598
Plaintiff:
Alice Duhe
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amie et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv01604
Plaintiff:
Tina Amie and Craig Amie
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scruggs et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv01612
Plaintiff:
Peggy Scruggs and William Scruggs
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Augustus et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv01601
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Augustus and Charles Augustus
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olivier et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv01366
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and others
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn M Olivier and Armand Olivier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lerille et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01105
Plaintiff:
Wayne William Lerille and Nancy Lee Lerille
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00880
Plaintiff:
Sherry Gill Simpson and Ricky Simpson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopkins v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00781
Plaintiff:
Celestine Hopkins
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Gynecare, Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Springer et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00623
Plaintiff:
Cherise Springer and Marty Springer
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blake v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00598
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Blake
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
