Cases 51 - 60 of 231
Simoneaux v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00270
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Rickey J. Simoneaux
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Aydell v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01181
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Troy Aydell
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Rhodus v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00545
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Linda Kay Rhodus
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Scott et al v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00493
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Gaye N Scott
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Breau v. BerryHill
as 3:2017cv00413
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John Glynn Breau
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Darbonne v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00371
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
John A. Darbonne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Lodge v. Colvin
as 3:2017cv00196
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Latoya Lodge
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Garrett v. Colvin
as 3:2017cv00180
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Margarite Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Garrett v. Colvin
as 3:2017cv00181
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Margarite Garrett
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Banks v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00769
Plaintiff:
Monica Banks
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
