Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Benz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2012cv01884
Plaintiff:
Christine Benz , Suzette Bourque , Raymond Bourque and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon S A R L and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Semere v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 6:2012cv01550
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Semere
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc , Johnson & Johnson , Regional Health System of Acadiana L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brennon v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00505
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J Brennon
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00507
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn N Carr and Rundell D Carr
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pilgreen et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Donna T Pilgreen and James W Pilgreen
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00191
Plaintiff:
DIna S Bennett
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01937
Plaintiff:
Shirley Carnella Carroll and J C Carroll
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc, Ethicon Inc and Boston Scientific Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01894
Plaintiff:
Charlene Logan Taylor
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01897
Plaintiff:
Susan C Hayes and Leonard Hayes
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrow et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01866
Plaintiff:
Tina Morrow and Kenneth Morrow
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
