Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Jakeway v. Schneider et al
as 4:2024cv01090
Defendant:
Lawrence M. Schneider, Laurence M. Schneider, Adam N. Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Donald Jakeway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Leday et al v. CarMax Business Services, LLC D/B/A CarMax Auto Finance
as 4:2024cv01804
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Leday
Defendant:
CarMax Business Services, LLC D/B/A CarMax Auto Finance
Cross Defendant:
DLT Recovery LLC dba Hooked Recovery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EnvTech, Inc. v. DeBusk
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
EnvTech, Inc.
Defendant:
patrick andrew debusk
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Velasquez v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01569
Plaintiff:
Kim Velasquez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Li v. Defendant 1, a/k/a "Annie" et al
as 4:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Phillip Li
Defendant:
Defendant 1, a/k/a "Annie" and John Does 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Matamoros v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Marlon Matamoros
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DeYoung v. Conner et al
as 4:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Executor Anna DeYoung
Defendant:
James Christopher Conner, Conner and Associates LLC d/b/a Franchise Marketing Systems, Greg Rondinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kiarie v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01319
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kiarie
Defendant:
Mialin Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Iraheta v. Doe (1) et al
as 4:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Iraheta
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jakeway v. Schneider et al
as 4:2024mc00442
Defendant:
Lawrence M. Schneider, Laurence M. Schneider, Adam N. Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Donald Jakeway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
