Cases 41 - 50 of 4,984
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Adel Cherif and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Anthony Quaranta, Michael Amiri and Houston KP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Michaek E Nero and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation et al
as 4:2024mc00490
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation and Daniel Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Pilot VII Services Inc.
as 1:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Pilot VII Services Inc.
Claimant:
Robyn Dunkin, Clay Dunkin and Brazos-Santiago Pilots, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30511 Action by Owner for Limitation
Parker v. General Motors LLC
as 7:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Flores et al v. General Motors LLC
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Alexis Flores and Rubicela Davila
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Texas v. Colony Ridge, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
Colony Ridge, Inc., Colony Ridge Development, LLC, Colony Ridge BV, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gallegos v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gallegos
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Filed in Error
as 7:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Guerra Quezada v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jorge Antonio Guerra Quezada
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Acting Director Tae Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
