Cases 51 - 60 of 4,984
Filed in error v. Filed in error
as 4:2024cv00836
Defendant:
AIS Designs Co., Jose de Jesus Salazar, J.J.S.Custom Built Homes, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
FILED IN ERROR
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
INCORRECTLY FILED Do not docket in this case. File only in (4:24CV819).
as 4:2024mc00345
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
INCORRECTLY FILED Do not docket in this case. File only in (4:24cv00818).
as 4:2024mc00344
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00774
Defendant:
Christopher Ellis, NCB Management Services, Inc. and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00773
Defendant:
Christopher Ellis, NCB Management Services, Inc. and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
UBS Financial Services, Inc. et al v. Dormier
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
UBS Financial Services, Inc. and UBS Credit Corp.
Defendant:
Christine Tan Dormier
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Eileen Elizabeth Royce and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
NewRez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
James Gilligan
Defendant:
IKG USA, LLC and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
George Esquivel
Defendant:
Muzom Transportation and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00692
Defendant:
David R. Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
