Cases 61 - 70 of 4,984
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Amunique Love and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Apache Corporation
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00580
Defendant:
Corinthia Williams and HealthTrust Workforce Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Colony Ridge Development, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv04729
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Colony Ridge Development, LLC doing business as Terrenos Houston doing business as Terrenos Santa Fe doing business as Lotes y Ranchos, Colony Ridge BV, LLC, Colony Ridge Land, LLC doing business as Terrenos Houston doing business as Lotes y Ranchos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
FILED IN ERROR v. FILED IN ERROR
as 2:2024cv00042
Defendant:
Guadalupe Pompa, Jr., Robert Dan Riza and FILED IN ERROR
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Franklin v. Carter
as 4:2023cv04759
Plaintiff:
Ephesian J. Franklin
Defendant:
Shawn Corey Carter
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024mc00227
Plaintiff:
Filed Incorrectly
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly filed
as 4:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rowland M. Andrade and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
ABTC Corp. and IRS (United States of America)
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rowland M. Andrade and ABTC Corp.
Defendant:
IRS - SD TX
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
