Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Doe v. NOSF, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00499
Defendant:
Catholic Diocese of El Paso, Stephen Furches and NOSF, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Segura et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2012cv00419
Defendant:
Aldo Carrillo, Fernando Cervantes, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Monica Rubio, Norma Segura and Rogelio Segura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Doe et al v. Lockhart Independent School District
as 1:2012cv00869
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Monica Guillory, Thomas Christopher Knox, Lockhart Independent School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moreno v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv00856
Defendant:
Jeffrey M Crawley, John Doe, 1, John Doe, Train and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Durante Moreno and Ruben D Moreno, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cavanaugh et al v. Fortenberry et al
as 1:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
Gerald R. Cavanaugh, Gerald R. Cavanaugh, David Scott and others
Defendant:
Roland D. Fortenberry, Jr. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chavira et al v. Dean Foods Company et al
as 3:2008cv00468
Plaintiff:
Javier Chavira and Stella Lorraine Saldivar
Defendant:
Dean Foods Company, Dean Foods Company, Creamland Dairies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rivas Lopez et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
Tomas Rivas Lopez and Maria Isabel Parada De Rivas
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Julie Meyers, Division of Immigration Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Murray
as 1:2008cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Richard Day Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
