Cases 51 - 60 of 7,267
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Affordable Overhead Door Company v. Affordable Garage Professionals, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Affordable Overhead Door Company
Defendant:
Affordable Garage Professionals, LLC and Steve Valderas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Affordable Overhead Door Company
Defendant:
Affordable Garage Professionals, LLC and Thomas Tamez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. SHGY II ENTERPRISES INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., House of Cash, Inc., Sic Pig Songs, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
SHGY II ENTERPRISES INC., Ajwad Imad, CARLO ELNAKAT and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Cardiacsense LTD v. Suunto
as 6:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Cardiacsense LTD
Defendant:
Suunto
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cardiacsense LTD v. Coros Wearables, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Cardiacsense LTD
Defendant:
Coros Wearables, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
