Cases 61 - 70 of 7,265
ACQIS LLC v. Adlink Technology, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
ACQIS LLC
Defendant:
Adlink Technology, Inc. and Adlink Technology (China) Co Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Cellular South Inc v. Google, LLC
as 6:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Cellular South Inc
Defendant:
Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Fotohaus, LLC v. DSCH Capital Partners, LLC
as 1:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Fotohaus, LLC
Defendant:
DSCH Capital Partners, LLC doing business as Far West Capital
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Beyond, Inc. d/b/a Overstock v. Good Deal Charlie, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Beyond, Inc.. d/b/a Overstock
Defendant:
Good Deal Charlie, Inc., Good Stores Texas, LLC, February Furniture, LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
AML IP, LLC v. Cost Plus World Market, LLC
as 6:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
Cost Plus World Market, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
AML IP, LLC v. J Choo USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
J Choo USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TPV Technology Ltd. et al v. WFR IP, LLC
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
TPV Technology Ltd. and TPV-USA Corp.
Defendant:
WFR IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Twitch LLC v. Bote, LLC
as 6:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Twitch LLC doing business as Hala Gear
Defendant:
Bote, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
AlmondNet, Inc. et al, v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
AlmondNet, Inc. and Datonics LLC,
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon Web Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
S3G Technology LLC v. Massage Envy Franchising LLC
as 6:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
Massage Envy Franchising LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
