Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Briones, et al. v. Bank of America, NA, et al.
as 3:2012cv00294
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Raymond A. Malphurs and others
Plaintiff:
Celso G. Briones and Dora M. Briones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ibarra et al v. Bank of America NA et al
as 5:2012cv00461
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Bank of New York Mellon and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ibarra and Monica Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Gomez III v. Bank of America NA et al
as 5:2012cv00132
Defendant:
Bank of America NA and ReconTrust Company, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Frank Gomez III
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Calderon et al v. Bank of America NA
as 5:2012cv00121
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Plaintiff:
Nancy Calderon and Phillip R. Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
FILING ERROR
as 5:2011cv01092
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Plaintiff:
Elaine Foley Murillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Thompson et al v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB. et al
as 1:2011cv00089
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, Baxter & Reyes, LaSalle Bank N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane M. Thompson and Max E. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Moore et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, et al
as 5:2010cv01000
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America, NA and The Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
August Eugene Moore and Denise Louise Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Emiabata v. Bank of America NA
as 1:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Philip Emiabata
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
