Cases 91 - 100 of 261
United States of America v. 136.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Grenada County, State of Mississippi, and Estate of Alice Hardeman et al
as 3:2010cv00059
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Estate of Alice Hardeman et al and 136.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Grenada County, MS, State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 2.16 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Alcorn County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 2.16 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Alcorn County, Mississippi, Sean J. Meeks, Belinda Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 8.28 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Alcorn County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 8.28 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Alcorn County, Mississippi, Donnie Wayne Leonard, Justin Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-Of-Way Over 5.99 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Alcorn County, Mississippi
as 1:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-Of-Way Over 5.99 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Alcorn County, Mississippi and Roy Oaks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 1.66 Acres of Land, More or Less, and Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in
as 1:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 1.66 Acres of Land, More or Less, and Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Alcorn County, Mississippi, Harold Little, BancorpSouth Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.80 Acre of Land, More or Less, In Alcorn County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.80 Acre of Land, More or Less, In Alcorn County, Mississippi, Olen Voyles and Bernice H. Voyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Whitley v. City of Pearl, MS. et al
as 3:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
John Thelbert Whitley
Defendant:
City of Pearl, MS. and City of Brandon, Municipalities
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946
Mississippi Hub, LLC v. 1.00 +/- Acres in Covington County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
Mississippi Hub, LLC
Defendant:
1.00 Acres in Covington County, Mississippi, Patricia Oliver and Lavores Oliver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mississippi Hub, LLC v. 2 +/- Acres in Covington County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mississippi Hub, LLC
Defendant:
2 Acres in Covington County, Mississippi and Lavores Oliver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
United States of America v. 73.92 Acres of Land et al
as 3:2009cv00802
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
73.92 Acres of Land, Annandale Investors, L.P, Reunion, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
