Cases 121 - 130 of 202
Card v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00731
Plaintiff:
Shirley Card
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Magee v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00823
Plaintiff:
Sammy Magee
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blevins v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00724
Plaintiff:
Ira Blevins
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does, 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00783
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Ward
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baxter v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00719
Plaintiff:
Charles Baxter
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harp v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tommy Harp
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chiplin v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00841
Plaintiff:
Charles Chiplin
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singleton v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00762
Plaintiff:
Sharon Singleton
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00833
Plaintiff:
Betty Moore
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00806
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
