Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Jones v. Garlock, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00603
Plaintiff:
John R. Jones
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pullman Passenger Car Company, Inc., Railroad Friction Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jenkins v. Garlock, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00601
Plaintiff:
Marshall Jenkins
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pullman Passenger Car Company, Inc., Railroad Friction Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bell v. Garlock, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00589
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bell
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pullman Passenger Car Company, Inc., Railroad Friction Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hall, et al. v. Garlock, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00597
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hall and Virgie Hall
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pullman Passenger Car Company, Inc., Railroad Friction Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hudson v. Garlock, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00600
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hudson
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pullman Passenger Car Company, Inc., Railroad Friction Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Watson v. Hopeman Brothers et al
as 1:2007cv00468
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Watson and Richard L. Watson
Defendant:
Hopeman Brothers, S B Decking, Inc., Enpro Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Reeves v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Reeves, Robert L. Reeves, Robert L. Reeves and others
Defendant:
Afton Pumps, Inc., AGCO Corporation, AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
