Cases 71 - 80 of 11,576
LaRose v. Missouri City Police Department
as 4:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Pshatoia LaRose
Defendant:
Missouri City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company v. Orellana
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Godofredo A. Orellana and Godofredo A Orellana doing business as Orellanas Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Davis Jr. v. Jose Chapa Law Firm
as 4:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Peter Davis Jr.
Defendant:
Jose Chapa Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Zinsmeyer v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Dustin Allan Zinsmeyer
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Obrien v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Chandria Obrien
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mendez et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Caleb Mendez and Javier Cuellar
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Roman Jr. v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Roman Jr.
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gomez v. Gomez
as 4:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Eduardo Padilla Gomez
Defendant:
Monserrat Armas Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11607 Int'l Child Abduction Act
Axip Energy Services, LP v. W&T Offshore, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
Axip Energy Services, LP
Defendant:
W&T Offshore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Dowling v. City of Houston
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Dowling and Angela D. Dowling Perez
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
