Contract Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Riverside Urgent Care, LLC et al v. Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's of London, Lloyd's of London
as 2:2022cv04635
Plaintiff: Riverside Urgent Care, LLC and Laplace Urgent Care Center Properties, LLC
Defendant: Certain Underwriters LLoyd's London, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Lloyd's of London and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Kerlerec Condominium Association, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
as 2:2022cv03847
Plaintiff: Kerlerec Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, subscribing to Policy No. JTA251026 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
City Land Properties et al v. StarStone Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv03797
Plaintiff: City Land Properties, J and J Partners, LLC and Diversified Enterprise of New Orleans, LLC
Defendant: StarStone Specialty Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
124 N Genois, LLC et al v. StarStone Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv03782
Plaintiff: 124 N Genois, LLC, Diversified Enterprise of New Orleans, LLC, 124 N Genois LLC and others
Defendant: StarStone Specialty Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Aras v. Secured Risk Insurance Group Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv05617
Plaintiff: Nev Aras
Defendant: Secured Risk Ins. Group, Inc., Secured Risk Insurance Group Inc and Certain Underwriters of Lloyds of London
Special Master: Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Natchitoches Parish School Board v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London et al
as 3:2022cv00693
Plaintiff: Natchitoches Parish School Board
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Type: Contract Insurance
Pate v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
as 2:2022cv02985
Plaintiff: Rickey Pate, Jr.
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Fruge v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London et al
as 2:2022cv05083
Plaintiff: Kim Fruge
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds - Lloyds of London, Underwriters at Lloyds of London and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Special Master: Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Evangeline Bingo & Gaming L L C v. Certain Underwriters of Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No CLICPKG11558
as 6:2022cv03898
Plaintiff: Evangeline Bingo & Gaming L L C
Defendant: Certain Underwriters of Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No CLICPKG11558
Special Master: Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Spratt, et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
as 2:2022cv02748
Plaintiff: Tim Spratt and Rachel Barrios Spratt
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?