Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Cady v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Shawn O. Cady
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Waters v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 2:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Madlyon Carol Waters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration Commissioner c/o General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hunt v. Barnes
as 1:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Courtney O. Hunt
Defendant:
Paul Barnes
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Partin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00158
Defendant:
Deborah O. Partin and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mathis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2008cv00386
Plaintiff:
Ella O. Mathis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mississippi Care Center of Morton, LLC v. Leavitt
as 3:2007cv00498
Plaintiff:
Mississippi Care Center of Morton, LLC, Mississippi Care Center of Morton, LLC and Mississippi Care Center of Morton, LLC
Defendant:
Michael O. Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Roberts v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael O. Roberts
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McDonald
as 1:2007cv00082
Plaintiff:
Yolanda McDonald and Yolanda McDonald
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael J. Astrue and Social Security Administration Commissioner c/o General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rasche v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00081
Plaintiff:
Deborah Rasche and Deborah Rasche
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration Commissioner c/o General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
