Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Rodriguez v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00032
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Rodriguez
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodriguez v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00708
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Duvelza Esperanza Rodriguez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00825
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Gail Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Astrue et al
as 4:2012cv03379
Plaintiff:
Velen Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Social Security Administration (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00058
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Estela I. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodriguez v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv00082
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Raquel Rodriguez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00436
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Natalia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00398
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00399
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rene Rodriguez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
