Cases 101 - 110 of 1,339
Backstrom v. Lumpkin
as 21-50880
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steven Michael Backstrom
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 21-10933
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin Ray Taylor
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Peters v. TDCJ
as 21-20507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, State of Texas and Dinah Hoffman, Mailroom Supervisor
Saenz v. Collier
as 21-20505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Anthony Saenz
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, ONLY IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Katherine Pitman, ONLY IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Tracy v. Lumpkin
as 21-40686
Petitioner / Appellant:
Billy Tracy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Peters v. TDCJ
as 21-20506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and State of Texas
Wooten v. Lumpkin
as 21-10924
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Wooten
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mendoza v. Lumpkin
as 21-20501
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mike Mendoza, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Conner v. Lumpkin
as 21-10922
Petitioner / Appellant:
Stacy L. Conner
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 21-50855
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
