Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Chakkiyattil et al v. Signal International, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
George Paily Paulose Chakkiyattil , Chandrasekhara Pillai Rajesh Chemmanappilly , Sukumar Moses Dokka and others
Defendant:
Signal International, LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Malvern C. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Krishnakutty et al v. Signal International LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Sabu Puthukkuttumel Veede Krishnakutty and Thampy Putham Parambil Edicula
Defendant:
Signal International LLC , Indo-Ameri Soft LLC, Kurella Rao and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Achari et al v. Signal International, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
Lakshmanan Ponnayan Achari , Kodakeril Baby Biji , Xavier Disoliyan and others
Defendant:
Signal International, LLC , Signal International, Inc., Malvern C. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Strong v. Jacob Law Group PLLC et al
as 3:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Michelle Strong
Defendant:
Jacob Law Group PLLC, Jacob Collection Group LLC, Michael A. Jacob, II and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kleckner v. The Hunsucker Law Firm, PLLC et al
as 3:2011cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael Kleckner
Defendant:
The Hunsucker Law Firm, PLLC and Gregory M. Hunsucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Stimley-Brown Law Firm, PLLC v. Leech et al
as 3:2011cv00446
Plaintiff:
Stimley-Brown Law Firm, PLLC
Defendant:
William H. Leech , Minority Capital Fund of Mississippi, Inc. , All Persons Unknown, Claiming Any Legal or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien, or any cloud on Plaintiff's Title to Real Property, including all trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
