Cases 31 - 40 of 99
USA v. Earnest Gibson, IV
as 20-20301
Defendant / Appellant:
EARNEST GIBSON, IV
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Andrew Gibson v. Eric Wilson
as 20-10570
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ERIC WILSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW JOHN GIBSON
Tony McDonald, et al v. Randall Sorrels, et al
as 20-50448
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISON W. COLVIN, member of the State Bar Board of Directors, JOE K. LONGLEY, Immediate Past President of the State Bar of Texas, RANDALL O. SORRELS, President of the State Bar of Texas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY K. MCDONALD, JOSHUA B. HAMMER and MARK S. PULLIAM
Amicus Curiae:
State of Texas and Texas Legal Ethics Counsel
Ryan Gallagher v. Uttam Dhillon, et al
as 20-10518
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, Texas Attorney General, SUSAN GIBSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN GALLAGHER, Reverand Ryan "Sasha" Gallagher
Shaivite Temple v. Drug Enforcement Agency, et al
as 19-51190
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN A. GIBSON, DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and DAN MCCORMICK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN SASHA GALLAGHER, also known as Ryan Sasha-Shai Van Kush
Roger Liverman v. LaWanda McMurray, et al
as 19-51053
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW SHOVLIN, PROBATE CLERK OF UPTON COUNTY, TEXAS, REX GEORGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER LIVERMAN
James Gibson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-50989
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD GIBSON
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ricky Ewing v. Gibson, et al
as 19-60724
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN ARNOLD, Individual Capacity and UNKNOWN GIBSON, Individual Capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY R. EWING
Philip Gibson v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 19-30581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP GIBSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL RAHAM SIHGN, Medical Doctor, TODD BARRERE, PREETY SIGHN, Medical Doctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
